Agenda and minutes

Cabinet - Monday 21 March 2016 7.00 pm

Venue: Lilian Baylis Technology School, 323 Kennington Lane, SE11 5QY

Contact: David Rose, Democratic Services Officer, Tel: 020 7926 1037 Email: 

No. Item


Declarations of Pecuniary Interest

Under Cabinet Rule 1.5.2, where any Cabinet Member has a Disclosable Pecuniary Interest (as defined in the Members’ Code of Conduct (para. 4)) in any matter to be considered at a meeting of the Council, a committee, sub-committee or joint committee, they must withdraw from the meeting room during the whole of the consideration of that matter and must not participate in any vote on that matter unless a dispensation has been obtained from the Monitoring Officer.


There were none.


Minutes of Previous Meeting pdf icon PDF 100 KB


RESOLVED: The minute of the previous meeting held on 8 February 2016 be approved and signed by the chair as a correct record of the proceedings.



Investing in better neighbourhoods and building the homes we need to house the people of Lambeth – Cressingham Gardens Estate pdf icon PDF 597 KB

    Additional documents:


    The Cabinet Member for Housing, Councillor Matthew Bennett, introduced the item and noted that it had been four years since the Council first started speaking to residents.  Lambeth council tenants deserved high quality, affordable homes that met people’s needs, and in 2012 Lambeth launched the Lambeth Housing Standard (LHS) as an aspiration not a legal minimum.  The LHS programme cost £500m in 2012 with a £56m funding shortfall, increasing to a £85m shortfall in 2016, with a further £30m to come out in the next four years, and the Housing and Planning Bill would add further pressures.  This meant that not all estates could be refurbished, but the Council was committed to providing decent homes and was having to make difficult decisions in the wider public interest. 


    Surveys on the estate highlighted higher than average costs of refurbishment, but the case for diverting funding from other estates had not been made and it was not fair to spend double the average LHS cost on the estate.  The refurbishment options were not favourable, but option 5 would see all current homes retained, with no loss of social housing, new homes for each tenant at council rent levels and enough bedrooms to meet the overcrowded conditions as reported by a quarter of residents.  47% of homes would be affordable properties at council rent levels with a lifetime tenancy; with 75 extra homes including 27 family sized homes.  The Council was committed to 1,000 extra homes to house the 21,000 persons or 1,800 families in temporary accommodation.  The consultation (page 223 of the agenda pack), detailed the breadth of opinion and Cabinet was in no doubt about the strength of feeling, but existing tenants would get the homes they need, and a full assessment of the People’s Plan (Appendix J of the appendices pack) was provided in Appendix E. 


    Neil Vokes, Assistant Director for Housing Regeneration, highlighted paragraph 1.27 setting out the high court judgment and paragraph 1.30 setting out the new round of consultation.  All five options had been reconsidered by residents and the responses were provided in the agenda.  158 additional new homes were to be built; with paragraph 3.7 detailing the finances and positive cash-flow. 


    Sue Foster, Strategic Director for Neighbourhoods and Growth, advised Cabinet to note the addendum, correcting paragraph 9 of the main report and paragraph 1.19 of Appendix A.


    Cabinet received representations from the following residents and representatives: Gerlinde Gniewosz, Nicholas Greaves, Georgios Sidiropoulos, Chin Ong, Tom Keene, Andrew Plant, Ann Plant, Helen Carr, Ashvin De Vos, and Albere Hanna who made the following comments:

    ·         councillors and officers had come to workshops unprepared, needing details explained, and could not answer, or did not reply to questions and a full enquiry was requested into the financial models, due to the lack of transparency;

    ·         the People’s Plan was not considered in any detail and was rejected after a short review and analysis;

    ·         the Council’s response to the People’s Plan had been inaccurate and residents had not received questions in  ...  view the full minutes text for item 3.

The Chair, Councillor Lib Peck, advised that due to continued disturbances that Cabinet move to the vote for the remaining items.


Lambeth Children's Social Care Improvement Programme pdf icon PDF 305 KB

    Additional documents:



    (1)    That Cabinet note developments since November 2015, including  the Improvement Notice issued on 16 December 2015, the Prime Minister’s announcement about  poorly performing local authority children’s services on 15 December 2015, a letter from the Department for Education (DfE) dated 12 January 2016 and a DfE Stocktake meeting held on February 16 2016.

    (2)    That Cabinet endorse the progress which has been made in relation to Children’s Social Care improvements so far, including progress toward key milestones, and note the feedback from the two Ofsted improvement visits.

    (3)    That Cabinet endorse the priorities for improvement going forward and note the progress which the DfE and their appointed expert advisors, Morning Lane Associates, will expect to see by June 2016. 



Public Health pdf icon PDF 300 KB



    (1)    To approve the recommendation to disaggregate the joint Specialist Public Health Team.

    (2)    To agree that the Chief Executive, in consultation with the Leader of the Council, be delegated authority to enter negotiations with Southwark Council to transfer the Lambeth Specialist Team to the council, subject to negotiations in relation to the transfer of staff from Southwark to Lambeth.

    (3)    To note that the Chief Executive, in consultation with the Leader of the Council, will appoint a Director of Public Health for the Council.

    (4)    To note the progress to date on the refresh of the Health and Wellbeing Strategy.



Healthier High Streets Scrutiny Commission report pdf icon PDF 109 KB

    Additional documents:



    (1)    To receive the report and recommendations of the Healthier High Streets Scrutiny Commission (Appendix 1).

    (2)    To note the successful engagement between the commission and policy makers which has resulted in a number of the report’s recommendations already having been adopted.

    (3)    To approve the action plan prepared in response to the Commission’s recommendations (Appendix 2).



Lambeth’s Community Plan 2016-2020 pdf icon PDF 310 KB