Agenda and draft minutes

Extraordinary, Corporate Committee - Wednesday 30 September 2020 6.00 pm

Venue: Microsoft Teams - please copy and paste the following link into your browser: https://bit.ly/2EsXHUA

Contact: David Rose, Democratic Services,  020 7926 1037, Email: drose@lambeth.gov.uk

Items
No. Item

1.

Declaration of Pecuniary Interests

Under Standing Order 4.4, where any councillor has a Disclosable Pecuniary Interest (as defined in the Members’ Code of Conduct (para. 4)) in any matter to be considered at a meeting of the Council, a committee, sub-committee or joint committee, they must withdraw from the meeting room during the whole of the consideration of that matter and must not participate in any vote on that matter unless a dispensation has been obtained from the Monitoring Officer.

 

 

Minutes:

There were none.

 

 

2.

Rush Common Consent - 20/02792/RUS - installation of permanent bollards along the perimeter of Windrush Square pdf icon PDF 496 KB

    (All wards)

     

    Report authorised by: Eleanor Purser and Sara Waller, Strategic Directors for Sustainable Growth and Opportunity Directorate

     

    Contact for enquiries: Simon Brooksbank, Planning Officer – Central Area (Brixton and Clapham), Sustainable Growth and Opportunity, 020 7926 7749, sbrooksbank1@lambeth.gov.uk

     

    Additional documents:

    Minutes:

    Brandan Wilkinson, Principal Planning Officer; Andrew Mulindwa, Area Team Manager (Central); and, Simon Brooksbank – Planning Officer – Central Area (Brixton and Clapham), introduced the report and responded to questions as follows:

    ·           Corporate Committee’s scope of consideration was for consent and principally whether the open character of Rush Common would be harmed by the proposals. 

    ·           The small size of the bollards, their spacing and form, was not believed to harm the open character of the Common.

    ·           Replacing the suggested bollards with trees was not a material consideration and could form part of the subsequent planning application.  Furthermore, trees were unlikely to serve the same purpose as the highly engineered bollards as they could not withstand the same levels of force.

    ·           If a different form of protecting Windrush Square was decided upon and was of material change to the proposals, the decision would need to come back to Corporate Committee for consent.

    ·           It was noted that the report detailed Cherry Grove which should be corrected to Cherry Groce.

     

    In discussion, the Committee noted that trees might lend themselves more to the open character of the conservation area whilst providing a green shield from nearby traffic; whilst bollards did not give a sense of wellbeing and were clearly a physical barrier.  The Chair reiterated that the choice of materials was not for Corporate Committee to consider but could be considered at a subsequent Planning Applications Committee.

     

    RESOLVED by 2 votes for to 2 abstaining:

     

    1.         To note the outcome of the consultation set out in paragraph 5 of the report.

    2.         To grant Rush Common Consent for the installation of 155 x 1100mm high permanent heritage style cannon-shaped bollards around the perimeter of Windrush Square.